http://twitter.com/#!/Brosner85/status/357827949535309825
The front page of Thursday’s Boston Herald doesn’t pull any punches about Rolling Stone’s terror glam shot of accused bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.
http://twitter.com/#!/jfdulac/status/357822812339179522
http://twitter.com/#!/Rookmatic/status/357872126553886720
http://twitter.com/#!/LannyForealster/status/357872218627260416
Some felt the Herald’s response didn’t adhere to the lofty “traditions of journalism” that Rolling Stone clearly exemplifies with its rock-star treatment of terrorism.
http://twitter.com/#!/steviesaf/status/357819357105106946
http://twitter.com/#!/sirjameswilcox/status/357872181151150081
B-O-O. H-O-O.
Related:
Full Twitchy coverage of Rolling Stone
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2013/07/18/photo-heres-what-the-boston-herald-thinks-of-rolling-stone/